COCOMO II Schedule Calculator
Estimate calendar time with the published COCOMO II schedule equation.
What this calculator does
Published constants C = 3.67 and D = 0.28 with the scale exponent derived from the user's scale factors. Compression is applied exactly as published.
Inputs and what they mean
- Size
- — Thousands of source lines of code..
- Sum of the five scale factors
- — Your own ratings for precedentedness, flexibility, risk resolution, team cohesion and process maturity. 18.97 is the published nominal sum..
- Product of the effort multipliers
- — Multiply your rated effort multipliers together; 1 means nominal..
- Required schedule compression
- — 100% is the nominal schedule. The published model accepts 75% to 160%..
How to use it
- Enter your own figures — the calculator never fills in a rate, price or benchmark for you.
- Press Calculate to see the result.
- Read the formula, variables, assumptions and source below the result before you rely on it.
Formula
TDEV = 3.67 × PM^(0.28 + 0.2 × (E − 0.91)) × SCED% ÷ 100, where PM is the nominal-schedule effort and E = 0.91 + 0.01 × ΣSF
Worked example
100 KSLOC on the nominal schedule
The published schedule equation, with compression left at 100%.
Reading the result
The headline figure is the main answer. Any breakdown underneath shows the parts that make it up, so you can check the working and see what changes when you adjust an input.
Limitations and assumptions
Results depend entirely on the figures you enter and are rounded for display. They are for general information and education, not professional advice.
Reference: University of Southern California, Center for Systems and Software Engineering — COCOMO II model definition manual
Last reviewed:
Common questions
Formula, source and verification
The published schedule equation applied to the post-architecture effort estimate.
The question it answers: How many calendar months does this development actually need?
The formula
TDEV = 3.67 × PM^(0.28 + 0.2 × (E − 0.91)) × SCED% ÷ 100, where PM is the nominal-schedule effort and E = 0.91 + 0.01 × ΣSF
- Size — Size
- (KSLOC). Thousands of source lines of code.
- ΣSF — Sum of the five scale factors
- (points). The organisation's own ratings.
- ΠEM — Product of the effort multipliers
- (factor). The organisation's own rated multipliers.
- SCED — Required schedule compression
- (%). 100% is the nominal schedule; the published model accepts 75% to 160%.
Units: KSLOC; person-months; calendar months.
What kind of calculation this is
Estimation model. This is a published estimation model. It produces an estimate, not a measured fact, and its accuracy depends on how well your situation matches the model.
Method
Published constants C = 3.67 and D = 0.28 with the scale exponent derived from the user's scale factors. Compression is applied exactly as published.
Assumptions built into the result
- Industry: The effort estimate is the nominal-schedule effort, as the published equation requires.
Figures this calculator will never guess for you
- No industry delivery rate, productivity figure, defect rate or cost per line is inserted.
- No optional component is filled in on the user's behalf.
Limitations
- COCOMO II is a calibrated estimation model, not an exact prediction; its published accuracy is a range, not a point.
- Estimates are only as good as the size, scale factors and effort multipliers entered.
- Compression outside the published 75%–160% range is refused rather than extrapolated.
Source and version
- Standard or reference
- COCOMO II post-architecture model — University of Southern California, Center for Systems and Software Engineering (COCOMO II Model Definition Manual — post-architecture effort PM = A × Size^E × ΠEM with A = 2.94 and E = B + 0.01 × ΣSF (B = 0.91), and schedule TDEV = C × PM^(D + 0.2 × (E − B)) × SCED%/100 with C = 3.67 and D = 0.28.)
- Published source
- University of Southern California, Center for Systems and Software Engineering — COCOMO II.2000
- Formula version
- Version 1
- Verification
- Reviewed against the cited source on
- How much weight the source carries
- Academic
- Applies to
- Currency
- The result is a ratio or index, so it does not depend on currency.
Related tools
Work out the hourly rate to charge a client so that target margin is met after overhead and non-billable time.
Find the true hourly cost of an employee once benefits, payroll cost and overhead are included.
Size a software application from its data and transaction functions before estimating effort or cost.
Estimate development effort, schedule and average team size for a software project of a known size.
Express cloud spend as a cost per customer, per transaction or per other business unit.
Set the rate used to apply manufacturing overhead to jobs for the coming period.